The recent trial of Sam Bankman-Fried concluded quickly with a guilty verdict on all counts. Bankman-Fried's parents were visibly upset by the decision, while he remained stoic. The trial lasted for about a month and included testimony from his former girlfriend, friends, and roommates. Former U.S. Assistant Attorney Kevin J. O'Brien praised the government's case, citing significant evidence and testimony from company insiders. The trial was initially expected to last six weeks but was shortened due to strategic moves by the prosecution. The defense faced challenges, including Judge Kaplan's restrictions on repetitive questioning and the disapproval of several defense witnesses. Bankman-Fried's own testimony was seen as a last-ditch effort to present a different narrative, but he struggled to answer questions and was accused of lying. Former executives also testified against him, with one claiming that he was the one responsible for taking customer money. Bankman-Fried's defense argued that his former CEO was to blame for the company's collapse. Despite the defense's efforts, the damaging testimonies were difficult to refute. The co-conspirators' testimonies will likely impact the severity of their punishments. Bankman-Fried's defense plans to vigorously fight the charges and may consider appealing based on issues such as the contested terms of service and his alleged lack of access to medication during the trial. Bankman-Fried currently faces a maximum prison sentence of 110 years for multiple fraud charges. The sentencing is scheduled for March 2024, and the length of his prison term remains uncertain. While some argue for a hefty sentence, others believe that Bankman-Fried still has a lot to offer society. U.S. Attorney Damian Williams described the case as one of the biggest frauds in American history.
Подпишитесь на нашу рассылку и получайте информацию о выходе новых статей, информацию об эксклюзивных скидках и другое
Или же подпишитесь на наш Telegram, чтоб всегда быть в курсе наших новостей.